First Manchester
|
|
||||||
RE: First Manchester
(21/08/2014 15:35)Dentonian Wrote: I apologise for the use of capitals, as it is tantermount to shouting. This was because I was exasperated by 37554BY's apparent refusal to take on board what I said about the current 510 & 536 being commercial services during the day (ie. at the times the 511 will replace the 510). I was particularly angry at the comment "of course, it doesn't work like than in tfgm(sic)'s eyes". It is ironic that we have been asked not to criticise Operators, but here we had a case of a Local Authority being criticised/blamed for a decision made by an Operator.Guy's, as an enthusiast living in the East Midlands, I have no connection with, or ever worked in the transport industry but, I have a particular interest in First Manchester. I rely on input from all of you resident in the Manchester area to provide useful information. I should hate that anybody drops out of which I think is a fantastic forum. I know at times some of the grammar used can be questionable, I'm "old School" now being in my early sixties, but if all took time to read & understand the comments being made in the threads I'm sure a happier situation can prevail. Pete. |
||||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 138 Guest(s)